Science, Global Warming Research, Policy, Bias
$10k or more of IRS tax debt? Get A Free Tax Debt Relief Consultation From CuraDebt [Click Here]
Most scientific and artistic scholars would certify that nothing in this universe is absolute and everything is relative. Although almost all scientific and artistic discoveries virtually started with very simplistic, direct or indirect, proportional or inverse relationships between two or more entities or phenomena. Over time with more and more research, and increasing number of discoveries, pretty much every model kept getting increasingly complicated. Until we reached point where there was the conclusion of discarding absolute values, and compare everything with relative values. If you look at the development, growth and evolution of scientific, social and artistic theories, you will find that models are still getting more complicated, by introduction of newer factors, modified interactions, and changing conclusions.
There is one model which appears to be an exception from this general rule, and accepted methodology, in last thirty years or so. It is the climate change or global warming model. Ironically, the widely advertised and propagandized model is extremely simplistic, although, it deals with highly complex topic of climate. The idea which has been widely propagated, advertised and advocated by Al Gore, IPCC, U.N., governments, media and multibillion dollar, so called, climate advocacy groups like Pew Center for Global Climate Change, is extremely simplistic, and has remained that way for at least last thirty years. After all, what could be more simplistic then fossil fuels causing CO2 emissions, and CO2 emissions causing global warming.
End of story. No questions asked. If you have any questions or concerns then you are an complete idiot, who is totally ignorant, and has absolutely no care for suffering humanity, poor people and mother earth. Anyone who raises any doubts about this extremely childish assumption, is an agent of profiteering oil, gas and energy companies, and must be getting paid by them. Even if all this creppe is true, at least we not thieves, robbing and stealing, hard earned tax payers’ money.
So, ladies and gentlemen, it may sound like an insult to your intelligence, and ours, and theirs, but the only active and decisive factor in this huge atmosphere of climate sciences is CO2 released by fossil fuels. Enormously hot Sun, with huge changes in its own climate, vast oceans, gigantic atmosphere of earth, trees, animals, natural life cycles of human beings, along with countless other factors, have absolutely no effect on climate, and they are not even worth considering. So, is the worthlessness of evidence about millions of years of hot and cold climate cycles, and ice ages?
You must accept all this because there is a global consensus signed 3500, government funded experts and scientists, less than 100 of whom happened to be, actually, climatologists, stated that Earth is warming at the alarming levels, merely and solely due to or at least seriously enhanced by human activity. So, for your own well being, lives of your future generations, and safety, security and survival of mother Earth, you all must immediately surrender to your respective governments, so that they can grow even more in their respective sizes, authority and power, control your lives even better, and tax you to the death.
When hackers hacked the emails of, government financed, so called environmental scientists, who were manipulating data, they were dubbed as criminals, who were violating government secrecy laws which mainly protect and hide corruption. Wikileaks’ story was very similar, too. Hackers published 61 MB, unedited files over the Internet, for everyone to read and review, something hardly ever done by governments and their agencies. These files were quickly declared, “out of context, skewed excerpts”, and we heard, “we never knew about it”. Whom! You must have never heard these kind of phrases from white collared criminals, before? Like WikiLeaks, it even got the attention of big media which almost never reports this side of picture.
There is no doubt that earth was warming for about three decades, in recent past. It is also very evident that extent of environmental pollution has increased heavily since industrial revolution. But all the archaeological evidence suggests millions of years of cooling and heating cycles on Earth. Yet life did not only survived, it actually thrived during and after those cycles. God has given living beings, immense powers, and capabilities of survival and evolution. I am, in anyway, not advocating an unrestricted rate of increasing pollution in our environment. We all have the solemn responsibility of keeping our environment, as clean as possible.
Temperatures were rising during last three decades, while industrial revolution started way before that. Post industrial revolution era, actually saw about four decades of cooling, before temperatures started to go up. In addition to this, just like historical evidence shows, even during three warming decades, the warming was not global, in anyway. Equatorial region showed mild decrease in temperatures, and glaciers in Alaska have been continuously growing. The biggest victim of global warming, at least from the standpoint of big media reports and Hollywood movies, the polar bear, has been surviving the cyclical climate changes, since forever.
On the other hand, it is highly scrupulous to say, without any scientific evidence backing it up, even if warming trend continues, which has already stopped for about a decade, now, in spite of continued and increased Carbon emissions, worldwide, it will destroy the planet and virtually end the life. Rather, it is very likely to improve the lives of people around the world, especially of the people living in Northern hemisphere. Carbon-di-oxide and warmer temperatures are very good for plants, trees, forests and crops. Plants, in turn, have an air purifying effect, as they release oxygen to the air, in exchange for CO2.
Better weather and climate for plants will very likely increase the supply of food and hence will reduce the food prices. This will be a key factor in reduction and even elimination of hunger and starvation from the face of Earth. The most of this benefit will go to food deprived poor people of the world. This directly contradicts the very well-publicized fear mongering, stating that the worst effects of global warming will be on the poorest, and most deprived. Improved farming and forestry will drastically change the lives of billions of people in world, as these are, still, the most bread winning professions in third world.