 |
| Unisex s round Golden Metal Prescription eyeglasses – Eyebuydirect s Abazam |
| $39.00 |
| These wire framed, Gold finished eyeglasses simply ooze retro style. Its classic round lensed look will never go out…[Read More] |
 |
Entropy is also a proven property of all matter in this universe. The organization and boundaries perceived by our brains that provide distinct existence of substances, structures, and organisms require creation for the existence and active force for the maintenance because Entropy, an inherent property of all matter, tends to revert the state of all organized matter back into “one” in which nothing will be distinguishable from the other. “The degradation of the matter and energy in the universe to an ultimate state of inert uniformity” Merriam-Webster.com. On the other hand, evolution is purely a theory that has never been proven scientifically; it is 180 degrees in opposition to the scientifically established law of Entropy. Organization, form and distinction are impossible without the act of creation. There might be some scarce examples of accidental organization with negligible property while acts of creation are all around us, like food, clothing, homes, medicines, learning, babies, etc. Even if there are some accidental creations, those are very basic. The probability of accidental or random creation of complex structures is near zero. For example, while creation creates millions of aeroplanes, no one was assembled accidentally or randomly. Let alone the perfect laws of nature that brought this universe to existence and maintained and probably grew it continuously. The natural laws in the universe are so perfect that Atheist Science calls it the fine-tuning “Problem” and has never been able to explain it even remotely. For example, the tinniest variation in gravity can destroy the whole universe immediately. The same is true if Oxygen stops providing energy to aerobic organisms, if water starts flowing upward instead of downward, if photosynthesis stops, If Newton’s laws stop working, and if fusion reaction stops in the Sun and stars.
It is extremely puzzling that most so-called scientists have such a dogmatic and long-standing faith in the theory of evolution that defies and denies the firmly established science of Entropy. Consciousness, intelligence, and harsh conditions may force life forms to make minor adoptions, but this does not explain evolution.
Atheist science also creates another serious problem with evolution. They say the universe is so huge with so much variety, laws, and organization that creation is impossible. I would make yet another opposite and logical point. Having this incredible organization, laws, structure, and variety with extremely low-probability randomness that defies Entropy is impossible. With creation, yes. We see this in mass-scale industrial production, distribution, and retail. Now, even at a much larger scale in VR.
I mean, consider the origin and formation of a DNA molecule. Nowadays, you hear a lot about Bartel and Szostak. This is just another Atheistic attempt to explain away the impossible, just like the origin of heterosexual reproduction. The possibility of the evolution of two opposite sexes in close vicinity and around the same time to make sexual reproduction possible is near zero. But, of course, they do not give up on this either. So, these two so-called scientists took the universe’s origin, elements, compounds, cells, enzymes, and RNA strands as given out of nowhere, with every single one already having an extremely low probability of randomness. After this, they brought cells, ribosomes, enzymes, and RNA strands close together in an advanced laboratory and structured settings. These phenomena also have a negligible probability of randomness. “They began by synthesizing many trillions of different RNA molecules about 300 long, but the nucleotides were all random nucleotide sequences.” Science20.com. They have already “synthesized” trillions of these molecules and brought them together in a highly organized and complex system under highly controlled laboratory conditions, all processes with negligible random probabilities. “The RNA strands to be attached were attached to small beads on a column, then were exposed to the trillions of random sequences simply by flushing them through the column.” Science20.com. Again, it is not random and has an extremely low probability of randomness. “This process could fish out any RNA molecules that happened to have a weak ability to catalyze the reaction.” Science20.com. Note that “fishing” entails intelligence, intention, planning, equipment, favourable conditions, and consciousness, each with extremely low probability of randomness. “They then amplified those molecules and put them back in for a second round, repeating the process for ten rounds.” Science20.com. “Amplification
and “repetition” is also an intelligent intervention with negligible probabilities in randomness. “By the way, this is the same basic logic that breeders use when selecting a property such as coat colour in dogs.” Science20.com. “Breeders”, of course, are interventionists with Cause-like properties. They all completely overlook these extremely logical and obvious interventions and say, Ah-ha, life can originate randomly. Anyone with an IQ of 25 can easily and immediately recognise that this so-called experiment has every possible, politically correct intervention and lacks randomness completely.
Are they really that stupid? Or simply dogmatic. To me, the latter choice is far more apparent.
Even if we make the wildest assumption that an organic molecule originated randomly, that has near zero probability in randomness, Any intelligent person can quickly realise that it will be rotten and decayed by the principle of Entropy and as observed by us regularly in the case of dead organic material simply because it will take about 5-10 billion years for another organic molecule to come into existence and join its ten billion years old predecessor, if it is lucky enough to form in a close vicinity which also has an extremely low probability in randomness, let alone the fact that universe is only a little over 13 billion years old, as per their science.
My friend, we would not be producing these vast amounts of trash and waste if evolution were happening instead of Entropy. We would never lose a loved one or a pet if evolution were beating Entropy. There would be no death, disease, pain, disability, defects, or imperfection. It would also be bad news for the antiaging industry because no one would be aging. All doctors and medical professionals would be unemployed because everyone would be just evolving and getting better instead of going downhill under Entropy. All mechanics, repairers, and handypersons would be completely useless. Over time, living organisms would only grow more significantly, powerfully, and intelligently with bigger brains.
