Anarcho-Capitalism: Immoral to Initiate Force, aggression

Anarcho-Capitalism

AVO Syncro Fogata Special Toro Habano – Box of 20

$252.99

AVO Syncro Fogata Special Toro Habano is one hell of a cigar, filled with tobacco from seven different countries. Rich…[Read More]

All wars, all murders, all genocides, all homicides, all mass killings, and all theft are because we allow and condone the initiation of force. If you inquire about personal and family life, most people will immediately reject the initiation of force. Unfortunately, organized religions and governments have indoctrinated people for thousands of years to get an exception from this most fundamental natural law principle.
Most people who would explicitly refuse the idea of initiation of force in personal and family lives would, surprisingly, condone or even support wars, genocides, demicides, mass murders, capital punishments, and theft, aka taxation, when it comes down to the governments. They never realize that they secretly have accepted the myth of giving governments exceptions from this fundamental moral principle. There is a primary logical objection to this premise: On what grounds do governments get this exception from a fundamental moral principle? Of course, there is no rational answer.
Public schools, corporate media, and political speeches only teach you baseless rhetoric. The most common answer to this question is that the government has this exception for our safety and security. Okay. So, a group of elite, power-hungry, deceptive, lying, fraudulent, corrupt, and dishonest politicians get the right to boss around everyone else with incredible authority provided to them by the people they rule over because some people are wrong? Really? How much sense does this make? Are “people” getting unlimited authority to control “people”? Hypothetically, because some of them are bad?
If they are people, too, and people are wrong, how logical might it be to give them unlimited authority over yourself and everyone else? What makes you think this power grab will not become a nuisance to society? What do you think can and will stop them from abuse? In the old days, the answer was that they had a divine right, which did not turn out to be a good idea anyway. In modern times, the answer to this question is because a majority vote elects them. Great. So, what gives you the confidence that a majority vote makes them eligible for exclusive powers and authority over everyone else? When you do a slightly deeper logical analysis, you find out that just like most other things in the religion of Atheism, this, too, is an entirely baseless and useless myth and a story. It is like two wolves and a sheep voting for what to have for dinner.
The majority turn out to be incredibly wrong all the time. Elected governments committed Native American genocide in the USA and genocide of Jews in Nazi Germany. Elected governments also kept India in abject poverty for decades and pushed wealthy Venezuela into a financial and economic disaster. Technically speaking, governments in Communist China and the USSR were also democratically elected.
So, what gives you that unshakable confidence? The answer is nothing but indoctrination and ignorance. Is it because that is what my mum and my KG teacher told me, or because my Civics and Social Studies books in public school told me? Seriously?
Libertarians have concluded that all collectivism is immoral. Any individual or group having a right to initiate force is unethical; we must be ashamed, not proud. Depending upon which side of the fence you are, either you must be ashamed of enslaving and violating your fellow humans or ashamed of giving yourself and everyone else into slavery and subjecting yourself and everyone else to violent violations.
I mean, you consider murder as violence, rape as violence, theft as immoral, fraud as immoral, cheating as sinful, and lying as immoral; what makes you think that it is okay when the government does it at a much larger scale. Governments killed about 170 million of their people in genocides and similar stuff (Wars not included) during the 20th century. How can any sane person accept this institution’s responsibility for themself, family, business, property, rights, and justice? No other person, gang, criminal, maniac, idiot, or institution can and does not come even remotely close to the government when it comes down to violence.
It appropriately said that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Currently, no absolute authority exists on this plane except governments. King was the God instituted by the divine right in the past, and now the religion of Atheism is to replace the daddy in the sky with government, and it is turning out to be even worse. Religions still had to follow their code of ethics, to the least. Governments have no restrictions at all. Shamelessly, the Atheist apologetics provide the excuse of having a constitution. Incredible! Do you know what the USSR, Communist China, Cuba, Venezuela, DPRK, and Cambodia have in common besides genocides? They all had/have a constitution that was very similar to ours.
When it comes down to the government, the Constitution is nothing more than another piece of paper. History has shown it again and again. But we do not learn. We are still so proud of our republic. I agree that America has been the best place to live on this planet for a long time, but we are still far from the ideal. It has become the most extensive, worst, and most expensive warfare and welfare state ever. Government officials swear to obey the Constitution but never hesitate to violate it whenever they hit a crossroads. The Constitution is there to fool people and get votes, and that is it.
That is why Libertarian Philosophy maintains that the only way to end coercion and violence is to end all coercive institutions, and government tops the list. We do not need any coercive institution, period. These are all fictions created by elite power arbitrators and grabbers. Free markets can provide all needs and required goods and services, including safety and security, far more peacefully. Efficient, cost-effective, safer, competitive manner that is full of choices. If we genuinely want peace and freedom, we must end coercion and embrace the freedom and choice free markets provide.